|
|
Post by 3timer on Feb 7, 2003 14:19:28 GMT -5
I see Cyrus Hawkins rated NO. 1, but I have seen very little results from his matches.... especially lately. He wasn't at Brookings. Can anybody tell me what's up with him for sure?
How about ya'll start making some predictions on who is gonna win 160 in the A's, and who will place high...
|
|
|
|
Post by derekpirner on Feb 7, 2003 14:55:33 GMT -5
1. cryus hawkins
2. chris moran
3. trevor bainter
4. lincoln bollock
5. steve atkins
6. adam hanson
7,8 ??
|
|
|
|
Post by johnyboy77 on Feb 7, 2003 15:38:22 GMT -5
If you have Steve Atkins placing then you better have Devin Toft form Canton bacause Devin beat steve earlier in the year and would have beat him again if Steve didn't stall his ass of in there last match. I see Toft placing higher than Atkins. Atkins although a good wrestler just doesn't seem to care and only wrestles and hard as he has to and not one bit harder then he has to to win the match if he is up he stalls if he is down he quits i just don't see Atkins placing high if at all at state.
|
|
|
|
Post by 3timer on Feb 7, 2003 16:00:51 GMT -5
Interesting.... Atkins placed as a Sophmore and Junior. I watched him pin Nebraska's no.3 160 pounder a couple of weeks ago. He may not be real consistant, but he is as strong as an ox, dangerous as anthrax, and has plenty of experience.
Still waiting to see if anybody has word on Cyrus Hawkins status....
|
|
|
|
Post by gooseboy on Feb 8, 2003 9:17:04 GMT -5
Don't know about Hawkins status, but he hasn't wrestled any other of the top rated class A guys that I know of.
|
|
|
|
Post by sdafan on Feb 10, 2003 9:51:57 GMT -5
1. Bainter. Always wrestles his best at state tourney
2.Moran
3.Bullock. Dangerous
4.Hawkins. Overrated
|
|
|
|
Post by gooseboy on Feb 11, 2003 9:39:17 GMT -5
Any of those guys could beat any of the others, without anybody being surprised.
|
|
|
|
Post by no_hoops on Feb 18, 2003 20:30:00 GMT -5
Hawkins had a sprained ankled, thats why he missed Brookings...but he's back now. he walked through the NEC tournament with 3 pins and was the most valuable wrestler. at the SF Lincoln Tournament in December Hawkins was schooling Atkins and then pinned him, I think he has what it takes to win it this year.
|
|
Fatty
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by Fatty on Feb 18, 2003 22:15:46 GMT -5
Cy's an animal. I have no doubt he'll win it. SF tourney is about as tough as state, some years tougher and he won that.
|
|
TYUI
New Member
Posts: 11
|
Post by TYUI on Feb 19, 2003 15:40:12 GMT -5
look for Duprel from sturgis to place in one of the lower spots
|
|
|
|
Post by gooseboy on Feb 19, 2003 17:43:13 GMT -5
lincoln tourney as tough as state? sheesh what planet are you from? It is a good tournament, but be real.
I didn't see watertwon, stevens, winner, mitchell or yankton there.... they are the top five rated teams, so how do you back up that statement again?
|
|
Fatty
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by Fatty on Feb 20, 2003 20:59:44 GMT -5
Back that up? Easy. 140lb 'A' was weak in '98 I should know, i took third and i've never considered myself that good. I placed 4th at sioux Falls that year, same weight. State champ that year placed third. Brett Hudson? of harrisburg took second, Hannon Hisek of Bon Homme. At the time they had something like 5 state titles between them. Either one of them would have cleaned house in the state a tourney. Theres out of state tournaments that are very tough too.
|
|
|
|
Post by gooseboy on Feb 21, 2003 15:41:55 GMT -5
uh...... ya
|
|
